Translate

Friday, February 28, 2014

You're Procrastinating


This. This is the story of MY LIFE.

And yet, literally as soon as I wrote that sentence I went and started procrastinating again.

I realized that today was Friday and I needed to write a blog post when I logged onto my computer. But then I thought, it is Friday and it’s raining and I’m in a good mood, so I’m going to read some stories that I have saved on my computer. Then I started reading more. Then I started watching Youtube videos. Then I ran across this one.

You’d think a video that literally accuses you of procrastinating while you’re watching it would make me stop, but no I kept watching more.

Talk about helpless.

Procrastination is a problem that I think almost everyone faces. There are very few people who are immune to it. There are some people who are better at not procrastinating than others. While I do procrastinate a lot, I also always seem to be able to know when I really do need to sit down and start working. The problem comes when a project is bigger/takes up more time than you were anticipating.

I feel like the problem when us, young writers in particular, is that we have so much access to it when we’re trying to work. I’m assuming that most of us do our writing on the computer on some sort of word processor. If you write on paper, good for you, J.K. Rowling wrote most of Harry Potter on paper before typing it up. You’re also incredibly lucky that you don’t have all of the distractions that are readily available when you write on the computer.

I in particular have a lot of reasons to write on the computer. A lot of the times I do so so that I can talk to Margaret about problems that I’m having as I’m writing or get her opinion on things. I also don’t buy a lot of music so a lot of the music I listen to I do so on Youtube.

And while I’m not saying that adults don’t procrastinate with them too, I find that our generation is particularly affected by distractions such as Facebook, Instagram, Snap Chat, tumblr, fanfiction, Youtube, Twitter, Pintrest etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. There is no end of website and aps that you can waste your time on. There’s a guy in my English class who spend almost 2 days straight mastering the Flappy Bird game (and his high score is over 215 last time I heard of. Ladies and gentlemen, it doesn’t get much more procrastinating than that.)

As I said before, I am no exception. I procrastinate a ton. So does Margaret. Just a few days ago we both sat down and determined that we were going to do something productive. This was us on Valentine’s Day when I was working on the Romance post and she was working on a short story.

[2/14/2014 3:48:57 PM] Margaret: How goes it?
[2/14/2014 3:49:07 PM] Amanda : ... uh... got distracted?
[2/14/2014 3:49:18 PM] Amanda : Bad Manda
[2/14/2014 3:49:26 PM] Amanda : How goes yours?
[2/14/2014 3:49:51 PM] Margaret: ...
[2/14/2014 3:49:54 PM] Margaret: um.
[2/14/2014 3:49:56 PM] Margaret: hmmmmm.
[2/14/2014 3:50:05 PM] Margaret: We really need to be able to shut the internet off with skype still on
[2/14/2014 3:50:08 PM] Amanda : Distracted as well?
[2/14/2014 3:50:19 PM] Amanda : Yyyeeaaaaaahhhhh

(I got distracted well over three times trying to find this tiny bit of conversation)

It’s tough not procrastinating. And I think we all KNOW that we shouldn’t procrastinate. We all know that everything would be a lot better if we don’t procrastinate. We’ll accomplish a lot more, the fun browsing and mindless activities will be more fun because we won’t have the stress looming in the back of our minds… but that never actually seems to stop us does it?

And then there are the things that you can’t really procrastinate on. It’s all fine and well to avoid doing your homework until 9:00 pm the day before it’s due, but for a lot of things you have to be ready all the time so that you can be prepared at any moment. You don’t want to get a response or a call or email or whatever from an agent/editor asking for a look at your manuscript… except it’s not ready for them to look at it. Burn and crash go your dreams.

Okay so that’s a tad dramatic.

But still.

Procrastinating is something we can’t really afford to do. Especially if we really do want to have two books before twenty *titledrop*. I have less than 4 years left. You never know how long it’ll take to get published. Perhaps this post is more an encouragement to myself than really talking to you guys.

And to finish this up I’m going to give you the one quote that always seems to be able to get me to actually do something.

It was said by the Terminator himself, Arnold Schwarzenegger in a commencement speech to some USC (University of Southern California) students. You can find the whole speech here

But here’s the quote: 

“But when you're out there partying, horsing around, someone out there at the same time is working hard.Someone is getting smarter and someone is winning.”
So, while you’re off procrastinating, someone else is working hard and getting an agent/editor.

If that’s not motivation I don’t know what is.

Friday, February 14, 2014

How To Write a Love Story

Happy Valentine’s Day! Or Singles Awareness Day, whichever you happen to celebrate. Or if you’re Margaret and don’t even acknowledge the existence of Valentine’s Day in your life, Happy Friday Post!

This is certainly one post that I can make. I write most of the posts on this blog, but even if Margaret wrote most of them she’d probably get me to write this one.

How To Write Loves Stories

Whenever Margaret comes up with a couple or tries to write a romantic/love scene it always ends up either violent or humorous. Most of her couples either dislike each other or are friends. Whereas I crank out a 2000 word fluffy romantic love story almost every week without fail.

Don’t get me wrong; my writing is far from all romantic fluff and cutesy couples oh no. In fact that isn’t any romance in my novel. Or at least I have no intentions of adding it. I don’t ship my two main characters, though I’m fully aware that a lot of people probably will. I also do write a fair amount of the angstier, darker couples.

That being said, I enjoy writing a nice heartwarming love story.

One of the nice things about love stories is that there are a million different ways to write them, but they all involve the same thing. It involves people falling in love. Now, what those people are is up to you. Whether they’re human, another species, heterosexual, homosexual, one person falling in love with another, a love triangle, love square, love octagon if you’re really daring, that’s up to you.

Once you’ve decided that there are going to be falling in love, you have to decide on obstacles. Whether the story you’re writing is entirely a love story or an adventure with some romance splashed in, there is some conflict. That’s part of what makes a story a story. In real like we like our love lives to be as uncomplicated as we can get it, but when reading or watching a love story we typically like it with as many obstacles as we can get.

Once again, these obstacles are up to you. If the love story is the side story, the obstacles can very easily be a part of the plot interfering with our characters’ love. The Prince has to fight the dragon to get the Princess. Or if the love story is the main plot, the Prince is traveling to save the Princess with the Princess’s sister and ends up falling in love with the sister along the way except he’s betrothed to the Princess in the tower.

Just like any piece of writing, get creative.

Probably the most important part of a love story is one of the most important parts of a normal story. Just like you want your readers to rout for your protagonist, you want the readers to want the couple together. Especially if it’s a love story. I really couldn’t have cared less if Bella ended up with Edward or Jacob when I read the book. In fact I think she would have been better off with a nice human boy, or better yet, single with a bunch of cats. So the point of reading the book was ruined for me.

The problem with trying to make your readers want them together is that there are a lot of different types of relationships in the world. There are as many types of relationships as there are types of people. A relationship that might work for a pair people won’t work for another. And because of unique perceptions on romance and what it means to be in love or the types of people we think should get together, we tend to support certain types of relationships and not others.

The method I usually use when I want people to like the couple I’m writing is make them really cute together. I really love couples that are cute together. Fictional or real. That doesn’t work for all couples, it might not for the couple you’re working with. I happen to have a talent for writing cute stuff. Maybe I’ve watched too many chick-flicks in my life. Maybe I’m just naturally an optimistic person so stuff like that is natural for me. But that’s one of my favorite methods.

There’s also the Bonded By Trauma approach. Some people are really, really attracted to couples that have been through a lot together.

Another popular one is Best Friends. Best friends get paired together all the time. Especially if it’s one of the characters who’s in love with his/her best friend while the other is oblivious or in love with someone else.

The Opposites Attract method usually works pretty well too. Perhaps not as well as some of the other ones, but there are a lot of people who hold stock to the idea that opposites attract and should be with each other. Especially if they can put their differences behind them because they love each other.

The couple that seems to hate each other while they’re really slowly falling in love sometimes falls under opposites attract, but not all opposites attract are hating each other while falling in love. Whether they fall in love because they get to know each other better or one of them does something for the other or whatever the case may be, people ship them like crazy. The best example I can give you of this is Elizabeth Bennet and Mr. Darcy from Pride and Prejudice. In case you were wondering, Jane and Mr. Bingley fall under the Cute Couple category.

And finally, one of the most popular, is the poor fellow with unrequited love. It doesn’t matter if this character is male or female, if he’s in love with someone who won’t give him the time of day or is in love with someone else, everyone will support that character. Sometimes, this unrequited love is for a best friend (see above). Best example: Eponine in Les Miserables.  The canon couple is Marius and Cossett. How many people do you know who actually like them together? Everyone loves Eponine and thinks she should have gotten the guy, especially considering she literally died for him.

And that leads me to the final big category of love: Love At First Sight.

It is a very popular method among fairy tales, myths, and Disney movies. Snow White, Cinderella, and Ariel being the most prominent. While love at first sight is a very romantic idea and I’m sure at heart a lot of us would like to believe in it, it’s very rarely going to make your audience really rout for your romantic couple. Even though most of us want to believe in it, very few of us do and we always take love at first sight couples with a grain of salt. That grain of salt can very easily kill your delicate rose of a love story if you don’t back it up with some actual bonding.

There are of course other big couple types, and there are other ways to make your readers like your couple. Those are just some of the big ones.


So, if you feel like testing your hand at some romantic writing for the day love romance and overpriced flowers and chocolates, I hope this helped and Happy Valentine’s Day!

Saturday, February 8, 2014

The Difference Between Editing and Revising

Okay so maybe this post was inspired by the assignment I'm supposed to have due on Monday and maybe I'm using this post as an excuse to not do that assignment... but... I'm posting something. That's good right?

Note to self: make a post on procrastination.

I'll do that next week.

*base drums and a cymbal*

Anyways.

This is a concept that a lot of people in my AP English class can't really seem to grasp. There is a difference between revising and editing. A lot of the time people, myself included, tend to use the two words interchangeably. I've told you all plenty of times that I'm editing my novel, but I'm really revising it (though there is a fair share of plain editing).

Editing usually entails going through and fixing spelling mistakes and grammar and awkward sentence structures. A lot of time when people think about first and second drafts and the like, that's the first thing they think of. That's pretty much all I did to my essays in 8th grade. And that's fine for an 8th grader turning in an essay for English class. That's not all right for someone submitting a novel.

Your first draft sucks.

My first draft sucks.

Margaret's first draft sucked.

It's safe to assume that every book you've ever read's first draft sucked.

Like a Dyson vacuum.

According to Google's automatic definitions, to revise means to "reconsider and alter (something) in the light of further evidence".

Second drafts are for changes. Real changes. You're supposed to reconsider and alter. Not just the spelling or the sentence structure. It calls for rewriting a lot of stuff. Getting rid of entire characters, adding entire characters, rewriting the first three chapters eight times, considering whether or not you're going to keep chapter 4, 7, and 13.

Just so far in my second draft, I cut out about 8 chapters of background information, added a minor character, changed the outcome of a pretty big scene, I'm trying to figure out how to seriously alter a couple of the other minor character's roles, expanding the first two chapters into more like four or five, changing the end... that's revising. And that's not even the end. Who knows what stuff I'm going to change for the third or fourth revisions? And then after that, who knows what my editors going to ask me to/suggest/help me work on changing?

Don't even get my started on the revisions Margaret's doing. She's more on like her 30th revision, but the prologue's changed who knows how many times, she's added a bad guy, her second main character's role has changed COMPLETELY, the situation surrounding her character's involvement in the plot has changed, the end has changed completely... It's ridiculously different.

Now, does this mean your other drafts have to be unrecognizable from you first, well, no. It still the same story, you should be able to tell that one is the product of the other, but should it be significantly better?

A resounding yes.

And you can always make more edits! Your book isn’t set in stone until it’s published (and even then there are editions where you can mess with stuff).

Whether you need to pay extremely, extremely close attention to editing is another post. Usually most people will say you should definitely make sure that it’s decent. No one wants to read a manuscript that’s riddled with errors. It automatically makes them less inclined to like what you’re writing. But it doesn’t have to be absolutely perfect.

Your first priority is revising though. Just about anyone with a solid grasp of the English language (and spell check) can produce a literary work that is edited and correct. Only writers worth their salt can produce a literary work with balanced pace and strong characters and gripping actions ect.


Moral of the story: Revise, don’t edit.

Fun example:

"'Never again', said the blackbird." First draft.

"Quoth the raven, 'Nevermore,'" Final draft.

Wednesday, February 5, 2014

I Found a Title!

Good news I'm sharing with you because I know you all care!

I found a title for my book!

Yes, the novel that I completed a year and a half ago finally has a name.

I would love to show you guys the process of how I came to the title and all the different ones that I tired out and dismissing and edited and tweaked... but I can't because it just kinda came to me when I have half awake this morning.

I go to a class early in the morning that starts at 6:00. There's time to go home afterwards before school, so usually I just wake up, roll out of bed, pull on a jacket and a pair of shoes, wrap myself up in a blanket and get in the car and sleep on the way there. Sometimes I'm half awake though and my brain goes into this odd half awake half asleep aether state. I'm awake enough that I'm controlling my thoughts but asleep enough that I'm not... it's really hard to explain.

Some of my best ideas have come from that state.

It's really weird, but awesome.

This morning I was in this aether mind place, and I was thinking about getting published and how excited I'd be telling my friends and family and you guys... and as I was, I imagined telling people "I found an agent who's going to represent Beguiled!" 

It literally just came to me.

Like I said, weird but really super awesome.

Has anything like that ever happened to you?

Saturday, February 1, 2014

Reblog: If Only I Had Connections

Yes I know I posted something less than little over 12 hours ago, but I just discovered this article and it just so happen to relate pretty perfectly to the last post, Hard Work is Hard :(

It's a long reblog. But trust me, it's well worth the read.

"If Only I had Connections", by Rick Riordan, Bestselling Author of the Percy Jackson and the Olympians series, Heroes of Olympus series, and the Kane Chronicles series. 

A few notes on getting published, for what it’s worth, expanding on some of the tweets I offered yesterday morning. Much of this I’ve said before, either on the blog or on my website, but many aspiring writers are interested in figuring out the enigma of getting published, and I don’t blame them.

I don’t offer these ideas to burst bubbles or discourage, but I think it’s always best to have a clear picture of what you are dealing with.


The assumption:

The main reason I’m not getting published is because I don’t have a foot in the door. If only I knew an agent or an editor or someone important to give my manuscript the attention it deserves, I would get published.

My take on it:

Connections, at best, might get you a slightly longer and more polite ‘no.’ They help much less than you might imagine.

The first time I got published, my only connection was a local novelist whose six-week writing course I had taken. I paid her to line-edit my first manuscript, which was very helpful, and which anyone can do if you’re willing to pony up the time and money. Most communities have adult education classes in creative writing at local colleges or high schools.

At any rate, when the time came to query agents, I asked permission to use my teacher’s name, then wrote in my query letter that so-and-so, author of x novel,suggested I contact this agency. Did this help? It’s hard to know. I got many, many rejections from agents. The agent who eventually accepted me as a client had never heard of the novelist who recommended me. She just liked the premise of my book. After I got an agent, she shopped it around and got rejections from thirteen publishers before one said yes. I considered myself lucky. My first manuscript was published! That’s better than many aspiring writers manage, but I certainly had no inside track.

The second time I launched a series, Percy Jackson, I still used no connections. I intentionally sent out The Lightning Thief anonymously, under the pseudonym Ransom Reese. I wanted the manuscript to sink or swim on its own, without relying on the people I knew in the business (though honestly, I didn’t think those connections would make a difference either way). The result? Lots more rejections from agents. One agent liked the premise enough to give it a shot. She had better luck with the publishing houses than I had the first time around, but it had nothing to do with who I was or the people I knew. It was all about the book.

No agent or editor will say ‘yes’ to you simply because they know you and think you’re a nice person. Publishing is a business – a bizarre, sometimes maddeningly convoluted business, but a business. If an editor takes a risk on a novel, his or her job is on the line. The editor has to love the manuscript and believe it will sell. Whether or not you have a personal connection is irrelevant. In fact, I’d venture to guess the submissions that editors dread most are from people they know. It makes it awkward to say no, but ‘no’ they will say, unless the novel is dynamite.

Similarly, agents have to make money by representing books that sell. They build their reputations by finding new authors who turn out to be successful. Whether or not they know you -- that means nothing. I recently spoke with an agent about writers’ conferences. Often I will encourage aspiring writers to go to such conferences, where you can listen to editors and agents speak about the business, schmooze with publishing industry types, and practice making your pitch. I asked this agent if meeting an author in person affected her decision to represent them.

The answer: no. At best, a personal meeting will assure that she would agree to look at the query letter and sample chapters (which she would do with any project that intrigued her). But if the idea or the writing did not ‘wow’ her immediately, she would reject the project just as fast. I then asked how many new clients she had found at writers’ conferences, since she had attended dozens. She looked rather sheepish. “None. Not one.”

My point: no number of connections will get a bad first novel published.

The flipside to this may seem radical: A good novel will find an outlet one way or another, whether you know someone or not.

Yes, agents and editors say no 99% of the time. But remember they are activelylooking for great writing. That’s the whole point. They would be in heaven if every novel that came to them read like The Next Big Thing, or even just a moving novel with quiet appeal. The sad fact is (and every editor and agent I’ve ever spoken to will quietly confirm this) most submissions they get are nowhere near publishable. The writing is clunky and garbled, showing a poor command of grammar and style. The ideas are tired and cliché.

I hear the embittered writers out there, because I used to be one of you. You’re thinking, “Ha! That description sounds like the last bestseller by X #1 New York Times novelist I read.” Sure, we’ve all read successful books and wondered how they got published. Taste is purely subjective, right? “Why, could write better than this!” we confidently declared. Easier said than written.

Even mainstream or genre blockbusters, so easily dissed, have some quality that made them successful in the first place. The pacing is good. The plot has twists that no one else has quite mastered. The settings and characters are memorable. Most of all, there is a certain level of technical competence to the writing. Even if he or she isn’t Shakespeare, the writer knows how to craft readable prose. This is no small feat, nor is it something that every (or even most) aspiring writers can do.

When an agent comes across a novel that reads like . . . well, a real novel, it is a rare and joyful event. The agent will not care if they know you. They won’t care if you are twelve years old or ninety years old. They will get on the phone and offer to represent you.

Which raises the awkward question: “Um,” you say, “but my manuscript is amazing and awesome and I write so well! Why have all these agents said no to me?”

Explanation 1:

It’s possible you are writing a book that the publishing industry would find difficult to sell. If the editor doesn’t see an audience for your story, he or she will most likely say no. A story about your grandmother’s struggle as a waitress in Louisiana in World War II? Well . . . aside from your immediate family and/or waitresses in Louisiana, who will want to read this? Maybe they will! Maybe you’ve managed to elevate family history into an art form, touching on the human condition in such a way that it will leave readers everywhere in tears. But the market is flooded with memoires that simply didn’t catch on. Everyone thinks they have a family story that the general public is dying to read, just like people so often think their guests are dying to see their pictures from their recent trip to the Grand Canyon. Most of the time – not so much.  We are not interested in your story just because it’s your story.We are only interested if you somehow find a way to make it our story.

In a similar vein, if you write Cyberpunk zombie novels set on Mars and involving dinosaurs, the publisher may have a hard time marketing such a novel. (Hmm, actually it sounds pretty good to me!) These niche markets are small and difficult, unless again you somehow manage to make the story appeal to a broader range of people.

Explanation 2:

Taste is somewhat subjective. We all know that J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter novels were rejected by numerous publishers. In retrospect, I’m sure those editors feel like idiots. Some publishers rejected The Lightning Thief, too. The less said about them, the better! But to be fair, editors have to go with their guts. They have to feel a strong connection with the novel in order to accept it. Once an editor acquires a book, they must defend it to everyone in the company. They have to represent it to the sales and marketing team. They have to fight to get the book a proper cover and a proper marketing budget. Most of all, they have to fight to even get the other people in the company to read it and be excited about it. You can’t do this unless you are wild about the book. Sometimes, books are simply sent to the wrong agents or editors.

To solve this, be very careful when submitting your work. If you write romance, make sure you are only sending to agents who love romance. If you write books somewhat similar to X author or Y author, find out who represents those authors and try those agents. If nothing else, this shows the agent in question that you have done your homework. Agents, in turn, try to be careful about which editors they submit manuscripts to, but they aren’t always right or successful.

So what if you target your submissions carefully, and still the agents and editors are ignoring you? Is this because you are so far ahead of your time, so avant-garde and original that no one recognizes your true genius?  Well, maybe. Or maybe . . .

Explanation 3:

That well-written, brilliant manuscript of yours? Uh . . . how to say this. It’s not as well written or brilliant as you think it is.

It is exceedingly hard, nigh impossible, to be objective about our own work. You have to believe in yourself and your own talent. You have to have a thick skin and persevere in the face of rejection. But you also have to listen to criticism if that criticism seems well founded. If twenty different agents have told you ‘no,’ something is wrong, and it’s probably not with the publishing industry for failing to acknowledge your brilliance. For some reason, your query letter isn’t getting their interest. Your sample chapters are not grabbing them.

It may be (I cover my head to avoid bottles thrown at my face) your writing simply isn’t there yet, and/or you haven’t found the novel you need to write.

I said earlier that my first novel-length manuscript was accepted for publication, and that’s true. But that wasn’t the first thing I wrote. I started writing short stories when I was thirteen. For years, I submitted stories to magazines and collected rejection notes. I would dabble with manuscripts only to give up halfway through. The truth was, I wanted to get published, but I had nothing much to say, nor did I practice writing enough to say things well.

It’s a Zen thing. You have to forget you want to be published in order to get published. At least, that’s how it worked for me. I went into teaching. I kept writing just for fun. Then, one day, the story I needed to write came to me. I was homesick for my native city of San Antonio. I’d been reading a ton of private eye novels. I decided to ‘visit home’ by writing a detective novel set in San Antonio. Suddenly, all these disparate things came together – my pleasure reading, my writing, my knowledge base, my yearning for home. And ka-bam. As I wrote Big Red Tequila, I knew it would be my first published book. It just felt different from anything else I had ever written. It grabbed me. It compelled me to write. It wasn’t something I could fake or force. It simply happened.

That’s not to say it wasn’t a lot of hard work. I went through a full two years of edits, and it was still rejected many times.

After it was published, it did only modestly well. A private eye novel set in San Antonio didn’t appeal to a vast audience. I kept my day job. I gnashed my teeth at the unfairness of the publishing world. Why wouldn’t more people read my work? Why wouldn’t the publisher promote me better?

But in truth, I still hadn’t arrived. I was publishable, but I wasn’t yet good enough at my trade to be truly successful. That took another ten years. Finally, another novel grabbed me. The Lightning Thief combined all my skills at writing, all my years teaching middle school, and my desire to tell a story for my son that would keep him interested in school at a time when he was really struggling with ADHD and dyslexia. The ingredients all came together, and I was ready and skilled enough to capitalize on them. Finally, I managed to create a story that appealed to a lot of people.

Looking back, I see now that the only variable I could control – and the only one that mattered – was my own craft. Connections did not matter. Perseverance did. Practice did. And learning to accept that maybe, just maybe, I still had a lot to learn about writing. I still do, for that matter.

I firmly believe that quality will be recognized. It may not be immediate. It may not be through the channels you expected, or in the way you expected. But if you truly have a wonderful manuscript, it will find a publisher. It will find an audience.

You do have to accept, however, that sometimes it takes a long time. Sometimes the manuscript you have written is not, ultimately, the manuscript that will make you successful. I needed seventeen years to get published, and ten more years before I could become a full-time writer. Maybe your quest will be shorter than mine. I hope so! However, don’t fall into the trap of thinking that the world of publishing is against you. Publishers very much want to find new, exciting novelists and make them famous and filthy rich. But that requires a brilliant compelling book. Sometimes we convince ourselves, “Hey, I’m that guy! I’m brilliant and compelling!” But maybe we’re not – at least, not yet.

One thing I’ve discovered. People who believe they are awesome and wonderful at their profession are often . . . not. People who have more self-doubt, who question themselves and are always examining what they did wrong and how they might do better – those folks are often better than they think they are, and they are much more likely to improve. It’s a difficult balance, between self-confidence and self-reflection. No wonder writers are a little barmy. But it is an important balance to strike.

So What’s the Secret Formula?

There isn’t one. There is no shortcut or path to success that will circumvent years of hard work and uncertainty.

So many times, aspiring writers have asked me to lunch to ‘pick my brain.’ They have the impression that I have some secret knowledge to impart. Some of my magic will rub off. If I just put in a good word with the agent, or read their book and gave them a blurb, their career would be made!

Sadly, I have no magic. I don’t know anything you don’t know. I just have more practice banging my head against the wall of the publishing industry, wringing my hands, and staring at blank screens. You can have this wonderful experience, too!

Blurbs – those little quotes on the covers of books – help very little if at all. I’ve been blurbed by wonderful authors. I’ve blurbed many other authors. I have yet to see any evidence it affects sales at all. In fact I recently came across a novel blurbed by none other than J.K. Rowling. A dream endorsement! The novel was one I’d never heard of. It was languishing in the bargain bin. No one, not even the Mother of Wizards herself, can wave a magic wand and make you a success.

“So, yeah!” you are saying. “Great pep talk! Thanks a lot, Riordan!”

But in a way, this knowledge can be reassuring. You aren’t missing anything. There is no secret being hidden from you. You are not being rejected because you missed a meeting of the Secret Society of Successful People. You do not need to know a publisher or an agent or Rick Riordan to get your novel published. You just need to labor long and hard, like all the rest of us, until you build your chops, pay your dues, and find the novel you need to write.

It’s human nature to look for shortcuts and easy answers. The twenty-billion-dollar diet industry is counting on this! Everybody wants to believe a secret food or pill or no-pain program will make you healthy and attractive. Nobody wants to hear the truth – eat less, exercise a lot – because that’s hard.

Writing is the same way. Like dieting, it is something many people talk about doing, many people try to do, and very few will succeed at. Like the weight loss industry, the creative writing industry will try to sell you all sorts of secrets and tricks and special insider knowledge. The truth is a lot less appealing and glamorous. Writing is hard. Not everyone can do it. It requires a combination of innate talent and lots and lots of practice and endurance. It also requires the right story, and publishing that story at the right time.

Most people will not get published. Most people who do get published will never make a living at it. These are simply facts. But your chance is as good as anyone else’s – assuming you have the talent and the story and the drive to put in the hours, days, years to hone your skill. It doesn’t matter who you know or what writers’ group you belong to. It doesn’t matter where you got your degree, or if you even have a degree.

So forget about shortcuts and magic coattails. Forget about meeting so-and-so, who might introduce you to so-and-so. It’s all about the quality of your book. Now get out there and make a quality book.

Oh, right . . . I knew there was something I was supposed to be doing.